#My book essential 1tb power supply iso

The board also wanted FERC to order a refund of certain monthly cost allocation fees.

#My book essential 1tb power supply iso

The board filed a complaint with FERC in December 2017 calling on the federal regulator to require PJM and the New York ISO to revise their tariffs and joint operating agreement to ensure that New York ratepayers pay their fair share for the Bergen-Linden Corridor and other regional transmission projects. But over time, the other parties got out of their obligations to pay for the project, leaving PSE&G, and subsequently New Jersey ratepayers, footing more of the bill. PSE&G, a subsidiary of Public Service Enterprise Group Inc., was slated to pay less than 6% of the project costs. of New York Inc., Linden VFT LLC, Hudson Transmission Partners LLC and PSE&G. New Jersey's regional grid operator, PJM Interconnection, initially spread the cost of the project among Consolidated Edison Inc.

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to review both rulings, marking the latest development in the ongoing dispute. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in May 2018 rejected (FERC docket EL18-54) the board's attempt to lower the cost burden on New Jersey ratepayers and later denied a request to rehear that decision. The New Jersey Board of Public Utilities wants a federal court to weigh in on a long-running debate about who should be responsible for the cost of the $1.2 billion Bergen-Linden Corridor transmission project.įor years, the board has been trying to get New York residents to pay a larger share of costs for the 345-kV double-circuit transmission line between the Linden and Bergen power plants in northern New Jersey that aims to remedy short circuit and thermal violations on the system of Public Service Electric and Gas Co., or PSE&G.